Oh, and the subject of the AfD... while I appreciate you wrote this before news was out about the Magdeburg attack, can you perhaps see why there is just a teensie-weensie bit of frustration with the German old guard?
The other is that the bill contained some eye-wateringly terrible pork-barrel items that should not have stood. You picked out a few bad takes in your article, but here's one to get your teeth into - section 605 - look it up!
It granted each house member (and their office) the right to quash subpoenas for data from their offices, to include all electronic records and emails. It makes the 'grand jury and discovery proof'. How can you hold the state accountable when its elected officials can just delete stuff they don't want you do know about?
Is this 'Musk meddling', or is this a 'last stand' pushback against the worst excesses of a bloated government machine that has no shame, no morals, and no standards?
Oh, and the subject of the AfD... while I appreciate you wrote this before news was out about the Magdeburg attack, can you perhaps see why there is just a teensie-weensie bit of frustration with the German old guard?
Well, that's one take.
The other is that the bill contained some eye-wateringly terrible pork-barrel items that should not have stood. You picked out a few bad takes in your article, but here's one to get your teeth into - section 605 - look it up!
It granted each house member (and their office) the right to quash subpoenas for data from their offices, to include all electronic records and emails. It makes the 'grand jury and discovery proof'. How can you hold the state accountable when its elected officials can just delete stuff they don't want you do know about?
Is this 'Musk meddling', or is this a 'last stand' pushback against the worst excesses of a bloated government machine that has no shame, no morals, and no standards?
I am surprised at your one-sided stance on this.