There seems to be zero evidence of any foul play in this story. Why not let investigators investigate and present evidence?
Is the only reason you have mentioned Russian interference is that it fits with the reporting on the NATO Cyber-Security conference that you also mention later in the piece?
In which case it seems a bit like 'grid' reporting as decreed by the powers that be.
Thank you Mr Starling. That was exactly my own reaction.
There seems to be zero evidence of any foul play in this story. Why not let investigators investigate and present evidence?
Is the only reason you have mentioned Russian interference is that it fits with the reporting on the NATO Cyber-Security conference that you also mention later in the piece?
In which case it seems a bit like 'grid' reporting as decreed by the powers that be.